FAQ: Your Right to Be Politically Active

PSAC members, like all Canadians, have the right to take part in the democratic process.

By voting, volunteering, or advocating for policies, you help shape the future of our communities and workplaces and strengthen our democracy. Your participation ensures that the needs and concerns of workers and their families are heard, making parliament more representative and responsive.

This FAQ explains how to exercise your political rights while following any necessary guidelines and restrictions, helping you avoid any issues at work.

Why is political participation important?

A healthy democracy depends on citizens being free to take part in choosing who governs and makes decisions for them. This involvement strengthens democracy and makes sure different perspectives are heard.

By getting involved in political activities, we can help shape policies that affect our lives and communities. This also keeps elected officials accountable, reminding them to act in the public’s best interest.

Can PSAC members engage in political activities?

Yes, PSAC members are encouraged to take an active role in exercising their democratic political rights. Examples of permissible activities include:

  • Wearing a party or candidate button in public.
  • Placing an election sign at your residence.
  • Giving political opinions in public or elsewhere.
  • Volunteering as a canvasser for a political party or candidate.
  • Volunteering in a campaign office.
  • Taking time off work to work on an election campaign.
  • Participating in the formation of party or candidate policies.
  • Taking part in election-day activities on behalf of a party or candidate.
  • Attending peaceful demonstrations on political topics.
  • Soliciting funds from the public for political campaigns and parties.
  • Attending a political convention as a delegate.
  • Writing letters to the editor endorsing a candidate or party.
  • Running for political office.

What are the guiding principles for political participation?

When exercising your democratic rights, adhere to the following principles:

  • Do not conduct any political activity on the job.
  • Do not disclose your employment with the federal public sector or your specific employer when participating in campaign activities such as canvassing, making phone calls, or communicating opinions about election issues through social media.
  • Do not wear your uniform or government identification at public meetings such as candidates’ meetings.
  • Do not use a vehicle that is marked as government-owned or belongs to your employer while participating in election-related activities.

What about PSAC members covered by the Public Service Employment Act?

Canadians have the right to freedom of expression under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This includes federal public service workers.

You have the right to take part in political activities during an election as long as it doesn’t impact your ability to do your job without political bias (and is not reasonably perceived as impairing this ability).

Federal public service workers (except for deputy heads) can support or oppose a political party, help with activities for their party or candidate, and even run for office in a federal election.

However, some restrictions apply to PSAC members covered by the Public Service Employment Act, specifically:

  • Political activities should not be carried out during your working hours.
  • There are guidelines if you wish to be a candidate in a federal, territorial, municipal, or provincial election.

In addition, public service workers, including those who work for the federal government, will need to consider whether public comments they make or political activity they take part in impact their duties of loyalty and impartiality to their employer.

Public comments or political activity may impact these duties when they are critical of the current government or address topics that are relevant to the employee’s job duties with the government.

Different workers will have different limits placed on them based on the nature of their job. In general, workers with higher levels of work responsibilities, higher public visibility in their role, or who do work related to the topics being criticized will be more at risk of breaching, or being perceived to breach, their duties than workers with lower levels of work responsibilities, who do not work in public-facing roles, or who do not do any work connected with the areas being criticized.

Although an employee of the federal or other government may be less likely to violate these duties to their own employer when engaging in provincial political issues, certain objectionable statements or actions not aimed at their employer may nonetheless be considered sufficient for such a violation to take place.

What should I do if I am unsure about a specific political activity?

If you are unsure whether a specific political activity is appropriate, contact your PSAC regional office for guidance.

What if I get in trouble for taking part in political activities?

If you’re disciplined for participating in a political activity, you can file a grievance. Contact your Local or Component for help and inform your PSAC regional office right away.

Are there additional rules for running as a candidate in an election?

Yes, there are separate and special rules if you wish to be a candidate in a federal, territorial, municipal, or provincial election. Ensure you understand and comply with these rules by consulting your PSAC regional office.

Who can I contact for more help?

If you have questions or need more guidance, contact your PSAC regional office. They can explain your rights and responsibilities and offer support if needed.

This article was first posted on the PSAC website.

Brian Masse to PM: “Show some decency” and make ’25 and out’ happen

Brian Masse, MP for Windsor West and NDP Industry, Canada-US Border and Great Lakes Critic, sent the following letter to the Prime Minister of Canada, as well as the President of the Treasury Board, the Minister of Public Safety, and the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour, on January 27, 2025.


Dear Prime Minister Trudeau and Ministers,

I am writing to express my support for the Customs and Immigration Union (CIU) letter of January 15, 2025, urging the Government of Canada to fulfill its commitment to offer early retirement eligibility to Canada’s border officers under the Public Service Pension Plan. This promise was made by your government on June 13, 2024, and December 18, 2024.

For over two decades, I have worked closely with border officers in my community and with the national union to ensure their concerns are heard by the Government of Canada. I have consistently advocated in the House of Commons for the implementation of “25 and out” for these dedicated workers, who play a crucial role in defending our borders, enforcing laws, and maintaining security for trade and travel. This legislative change is essential to ensure they are treated equitably alongside other officers.

Given that the House is prorogued, I urge you to act swiftly on this commitment. While the traditional legislative pathway may be delayed, the government can implement this change through an Order-in-Council or any other available mechanism. With the current challenges at the border, including the threat of U.S. tariffs, it is more critical than ever to recognize and support our frontline officers. Border officers are severely understaffed and require an additional 2,000-3,000 officers to address existing gaps and attrition.

The low morale among these workers underscores the need for immediate action to demonstrate support. This will also provide motivation for recruiting and retention, and as you are aware, other law enforcement agencies often hire from the CBSA due to their high-level skill and training set.

In 2017, the government ambushed the community with plans for the Ambassador Bridge expansion via an Order-in-Council, which highlighted the ability of Cabinet to make decisions in their interest. It seems odd that a private American billionaire family would receive privileged treatment from the Liberal government, yet our frontline officers are cast aside. Furthermore, you are also aware that this exceptional arrangement for this family comes when they have purchased housing only to demolish some, board up others, and destroy community institutions with the loss of families in the area. Recently, you are also aware that they have decided to stockpile large girders creating another unsightly blemish and potential safety and security risk as they are left unsecured on the former properties where homes once stood. Despite the original conditions of the Order-in-Council not being met, your government has continued to provide more privileges by creating exceptions for their plaza expansion that remain unclear, create safety issues for the neighbourhood and the border as we enter into 2025.

Mr. Prime Minister, your government has already announced twice that you would address the problem with the ’25 and out’ policy for border officers, yet the issue still remains unresolved. It is one thing to provide billionaire privileges to foreign families who have shown no respect for this country or its community, but it is our Canadian citizens who work on the Ambassador Bridge that you refuse to treat with even the slightest fairness. You have lied to those who must continue their work every day in the shadow of this injustice.

I fully support the CIU’s request and call on you to enact this change, using an Order-in-Council because at least this time it is for public good. You weaponized the Order in Council against the Windsor community, the least you can do is show some decency to use it for the benefit of the workers who protect the busiest international crossing and our citizens every day.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely,

Brian Masse

MP Windsor West
NDP Industry, Canada-US Border and Great Lakes Critic
Vice-Chair, Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group

Click here for the PDF version of this letter.

Statement on CBSA’s Suspension of Cumulative Working Period for Term Employees

We are deeply disappointed by CBSA’s recent decision to suspend the calculation of the cumulative working period for term employees. Effective April 1, 2025, the process that allows term employees to transition to indeterminate status will cease, creating instability and insecurity for many of our members.

Term employees are an essential part of the Agency’s day-to-day operations, and this decision sends the message that their contributions are not valued.

Now is the time for this employer to foster loyalty, morale, and trust among its workforce, not to burden them with uncertainty. We urge CBSA to find a more balanced approach that ensures term employees are not left in limbo. The suspension of the cumulative working period is a step backward, and it is our hope that CBSA will reconsider and engage in meaningful consultation with CIU to support the long-term welfare of all employees.

We remain committed to advocating for the interests of our members and will continue to press CBSA to prioritize the fair treatment and recognition of its workforce.

Federal unions join forces to launch new remote work campaign

Remote works - Pour vous, de n'importe oú
Remote works - Pour vous, de n'importe oú

Federal unions representing more than 330,000 workers have launched a national campaign promoting remote work as the future of work for millions of workers in Canada.

The campaign from the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), the Canadian Association of Professional Employees (CAPE) and the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) highlights the benefits of remote work for people in Canada – more productivity, less congestion on our roads, reduced pollution and better work-life balance for families.

The initiative highlights the overwhelming evidence that a one-size-fits-all approach to remote work is ineffective for Canada’s diverse public service and its future, and families who rely on public services pay the price. The campaign will be featured on the radio, in print, on social media and out-of-home ads across the country.

According to surveys and research by PSAC, 90% of respondents want to either work remotely as much as possible or have a flexible option. This data also shows remote work options and flexible arrangements are key to promoting a healthy work environment and for recruiting and retaining the best talent.

“The evidence is clear: remote work is good work. Flexible work arrangements allow us to build the modern, productive public service of tomorrow which will benefit everyone in Canada. It saves taxpayers money, is better for the environment, and sets the bar for all workers across the country.”

Sharon DeSousa, National President of the Public Service Alliance of Canada

“At a time when employees are being asked to do far more with far less, promoting greater flexibility, especially through expanded telework, remains relevant and is critical for retaining top talent. With departments facing cuts and pressures increasing dramatically, the federal government must lead by example and provide the best possible working conditions, while saving taxpayers billions of dollars. It has already been conclusively proven that telework improves productivity and employee well-being where it makes sense – it’s time for Canada to catch up.”

Nathan Prier, President of the Canadian Association of Professional Employees

“The future of work isn’t about counting days in an office, it’s about supporting professionals to deliver the best results for Canadians. By expanding remote and telework options in the federal public service, we can save taxpayer money, boost productivity, and improve workers’ lives – driving outcomes that benefit everyone. The key is “presence with purpose”.”

Sean O’Reilly, President of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada

Federal unions are urging the government to adopt flexible work arrangements, allowing workers to be more productive, have better work-life balance and make life more affordable. This should not be a political decision. Regardless of the political party in power, remote work is a viable option for the federal public service that could save taxpayers money and help make the public service even more productive.  The future of work is remote.

We are also calling on the public to join the movement and support remote work — not just for the federal public service, but as a new norm for workplaces across the country. The government could lead the way in creating modern and more productive workplaces. We invite all those who wish to participate to amplify this critical conversation on social media using the hashtag #RemoteWorks. Together, we will advocate for remote work and a thriving public service.

This article was first posted on the PSAC website.

CIU National President meets with Public Safety Minister David McGuinty

On January 16, 2025, CIU National President Mark Weber, along with CIU 1st National Vice-President Rick Savage, met with the new Minister of Public Safety, David McGuinty. This introductory meeting was held at the request of the Minister and most welcomed by the union, as it allowed both parties to initiate a discussion on a number of issues affecting the border and our members.

There was a particular focus on the expansion of early retirement eligibility for frontline officers, given the importance of this measure for our members and the prorogation of Parliament. While the Minister could not offer a definitive answer on this issue, he was appreciative of its significance and committed to looking into possible ways forward.

The union also brought forward its concerns with recent decisions pertaining to border security and the federal border strategy, notably regarding the lack of reliance on CBSA personnel to secure the border between ports of entry, which ought to be a priority to better respond to mounting border challenges.

Overall, the meeting was positive. At a time when border issues are at the forefront of public discourse, CIU is glad that the Minister is seeking to engage the union on important questions, and we look forward to a next meeting.

National President discusses border security on USJE podcast

USJE-SESJ-podcast-logo
USJE-SESJ-podcast-logo

Mark Weber is the latest guest to appear on Union Safety Net, the podcast of the Union of Safety and Justice Employees (USJE). The CIU National President was happy to participate in this episode to discuss ongoing border issues from the perspective of the union.

A huge thank you to USJE for having CIU on their excellent podcast!

Statement on the death of U.S. Border Patrol agent

Yesterday, a U.S. Border Patrol agent was shot and killed in the line of duty during a traffic stop near Coventry, Vermont, south of Stanstead, Quebec.

This grim event serves as a reminder of the inherent dangers associated with law enforcement duties, and of the sacrifices peace officers are sometimes tragically called to make. Our thoughts are with the broader law enforcement community as we offer our most sincere condolences to the family, friends and colleagues of the deceased.

Expanding early retirement eligibility: Letter to the Prime Minister of Canada

CIU National President Mark Weber sent the following letter to the Prime Minister of Canada, as well as the President of the Treasury Board, the Minister of Public Safety, and the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour, on January 15, 2025.


Dear Prime Minister and Ministers,

On June 13, 2024, the Government of Canada, through the Treasury Board of Canada, committed to expanding early retirement eligibility under the Public Service Pension Plan for frontline public service safety and security workers, including border officers. This was followed in the fall of 2024 by the inclusion of proposed legislative action in the Fall Economic Statement [1] to amend the Public Service Superannuation Act to that effect. Treasury Board also reiterated the federal government’s commitment on December 18, 2024, highlighting that such “early retirement measures recognize the demanding and critical roles of frontline safety and security public servants.”

As National President of the union representing Canada’s border security personnel, I am writing to you today to express how important the expansion of early retirement eligibility is for our members, and to share my deep concern regarding the future of these much-needed legislative changes considering the prorogation of Parliament on January 6.

Border officers are an intrinsic part of Canada’s public safety infrastructure yet currently do not benefit from a retirement regime consistent with other law enforcement officers in the federal public service. The Customs and Immigration Union (CIU) has long advocated for equitable retirement benefits for Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers. Our members work in demanding roles and face similar physical risks as other law enforcement officers. Early retirement without penalty would allow employees who have worked for 25 years and have difficulty maintaining physical standards the opportunity to retire with dignity.

At a time when border services are in dire need of more personnel, these measures would also help CBSA attract new employees by providing benefits comparable to those of other law enforcement agencies.

The June 13 announcement by Treasury Board along with the inclusion of proposed legislative changes in the Fall Economic Statement were therefore extremely well-received by our membership, as it signaled a real understanding by the current government of our members’ needs. Canada’s border personnel are dedicated to protecting our communities by intercepting dangerous drugs and firearms, and the expansion of early retirement eligibility is a welcome recognition of this crucial role.

In light of the above and considering the current political landscape, with prorogation in effect, I urge you to consider alternate means — such as via an Order-in-Council or other appropriate methods — to implement the required changes to fulfill your government’s commitment and expand retirement provisions for frontline public safety workers at the earliest opportunity. Doing so would send a strong signal that this government takes to heart the well-being of its frontline public safety personnel. Your government is to be commended for the work it has done so far to bring this initiative forward, and it would make sense for this same government to be the one to implement these highly anticipated measures.

I remain at your disposal should you wish to discuss this matter in person, and I look forward to your response.

Yours truly,

Mark Weber
National President

Click here for the PDF version of this letter.


[1] Fall Economic Statement, Annex 3, p. 230: “In FES 2024, the government proposes to amend the Public Service Superannuation Act to extend the operational service early retirement program to additional frontline employee groups in the federal public service, as announced by the President of the Treasury Board in June 2024. This special retirement benefit will allow firefighters, border services officers, parliamentary protection officers, and other frontline employees to retire earlier with an immediate unreduced pension after completing 25 years of actual operational service, or at age 50 with 25 years of actual and deemed operational service combined (at least 10 years of actual), as is presently available to employees of Correctional Service Canada working in a federal correctional institution. The proposed amendments would also ensure consistency in treatment for all eligible employees, allowing for career mobility within the public service.


PSAC Member’s Guide on Workers’ Compensation for the Federal Public Administration – Government Employees Compensation Act

PSAC logo SCFP
PSAC logo SCFP

Please find the Member’s Guide on Workers’ Compensation for the Federal Public Administration – Government Employees Compensation Act below.

This work was mandated by a resolution (COMPOSITE RESOLUTION 10A) adopted during the 2019 National Health and Safety Conference as follows:

The guide provides useful information to members on the rights of workers and the claims process resulting from workplace injuries or occupational diseases under the Government Employees Compensation Act.

The guide was designed to be shared widely.

In solidarity,
Sharon DeSousa
PSAC National President

Download: PSAC – GECA 2024 Guide

Prorogation: One more twist on the long road to ’25-and-out’ pension reform

The January 6 announcement by Prime Minister Trudeau regarding the prorogation of Parliament is an unsurprising yet disappointing bump in the road toward seeing the government fulfill its commitment to introduce equitable retirement for our members. 

While this decision means that new legislation cannot be introduced until Parliament is recalled on March 24, 2025, the Customs and Immigration Union continues to explore all avenues to see 25-and-out retirement made a reality for our members in opportune time, in line with the federal government’s previous commitment.  

CIU has worked diligently over the years to advance our members’ work conditions and see them treated like other public safety workers. We were pleased to see federal leadership finally take note in 2024. In many ways, the announcement in June 2024 by Treasury Board regarding the expansion of early retirement was a monumental leap in and of itself. Indeed, we have never been closer to achieving this important step.  

Last December, as part of its Fall Economic Statement, the federal government reiterated its intention to follow through on providing early retirement benefits to frontline federal workers. Unfortunately, the decision to prorogue makes it so that the current Liberal leadership is unlikely to be able to fulfill this commitment. 

Let’s be clear: While prorogation further delays the implementation of fair, equitable retirement provisions for our members, it is likely that the government would have been able to enact the required legislative changes were it not for the misguided attempts at bringing parliamentary business to a grinding halt by the official opposition, in the hope of triggering an election. Holding a government to account is a worthwhile endeavour; preventing meaningful legislative debate and the passing of important legislation isn’t. 

Given this, once Parliament reconvenes, it would be sensible for this chapter to conclude with the post-prorogation Liberal leadership having the chance to make good on their commitment and pass the legislation necessary for equitable pension reform, with the support of all parties. However, should future political turbulence make this impossible, we are hopeful that this initiative will enjoy broad support from federal representatives of all stripes, and we will engage with decision-makers accordingly.  

Our union has been through multiple fights and achieved much in the past quarter century, from securing arming provisions to negotiating class-leading collective agreements. These victories did not happen overnight, and the push for equitable retirement benefits is no different. If our past is any indication, this, too, will be achieved.