PA Bargaining: “PA Bargaining Team Tackles Many Fronts”

PA Bargaining

Child care: In negotiations this week with Treasury Board, our PA bargaining team called for the employer to join PSAC in a national joint committee to tackle the issue of affordable and accessible child care for all federal public service workers.

Public Works has been slowly ending subsidies for day care centres operating in several federal government buildings across the country, in some cases for more than two decades.

As an example, the Tupper Tots daycare in Ottawa closed its doors in 2014 after its rental subsidy was pulled. Today, the daycare at the Guy Favreau building in Montreal, and several others, are in jeopardy of closing, leaving potentially hundreds of parents who are federal government workers without childcare.

With a proposal that is common to all PSAC Treasury Board bargaining units, our bargaining team called on the employer to come together with the union over the life of the new agreement to examine options for providing appropriate day care facilities.

Definition of family: In a related vein, the bargaining team also reviewed with Treasury Board our proposal to expand the definition of family. We also proposed to remove language in the definition prohibiting an employee from accessing bereavement leave or family-related leave for any other relative for whom the employee has a duty of care unless that relative resides in the same household. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has found such language to be discriminatory, although Treasury Board is appealing that decision. We pointed out that the NJC Relocation Directive has already been amended to remove this discriminatory language.

Professional development: The PA team also proposed a Memorandum of Understanding for professional development of Parole and Program Officers at the Correctional Service of Canada. We explained the need for these members to have appropriate opportunities for professional training and development.

Leave: We also pressed for a Compensatory Leave provision as per the provision signed off at the TC table a full year ago, allowing employees up to 18 months to use compensatory leave before it is cashed out.

We also offered a Memorandum of Understanding requiring the employer to disclose what the operational needs are, should it refuse leave requests due to “operational requirements.

Whistleblowing: We also discussed the need for whistleblowing language to be enshrined in the Collective Agreement to protect employees who report wrongdoing.

Sick leave: Our position is that we continue to seek either a renewal or improvements to the current sick leave regime.

General economic increases: All PSAC tables proposed a general economic increase of 3% per year this week. This is in addition to the allowances and market adjustments that our team has or will be making in subsequent bargaining sessions.

Workforce adjustment: We discussed our proposed changes to the Workforce Adjustment Appendix. The employer’s bargaining team had a significant number of questions about our proposals that we will respond to in our next meeting. We reiterated our position against the contracting out of work. Many unions have identified this issue as a major concern in this round of bargaining.

See the PSAC website for information regarding bargaining proposals.

Federal public service unions united to defend collective bargaining rights, file complaint with International Labour Organization (ILO)

Canada’s 18 federal public service unions met earlier this week to decide their next move in response to the tabling of Division 20 of Bill C-59, the Budget Implementation Act (BIA), which gives the government the authority to unilaterally amend the sick leave provisions of the collective agreements covering employees of the core public service. Today, the unions are also jointly filing a complaint with the Geneva-based ILO asserting that the measures included in the December 2013 omnibus BIA – Bill C-4 – contravene ILO conventions that protect free collective bargaining and the right to strike.

“Our solidarity pact remains in place. We are united and even more determined to defend the constitutional rights of our members,” said Ron Cochrane, the union Co-Chair of the National Joint Council. “We are taking all steps at our disposal including appealing to the body that enforces international conventions on labour rights.”

The unions emerged from their meeting with a comprehensive coordinated legal plan to respond to bills C-4 and C-59 and stop the continuing attack on the fundamental constitutional right to fair collective bargaining, and a common approach to bargaining to push back the federal government’s latest move to impose a predetermined outcome on negotiations.

“Bill C-59 is all about trying to force us to accept a “go to work sick” plan by threatening to impose it if we do not agree,” Cochrane said. “It runs completely contrary to the Public Service Labour Relations Act (PSLRA) and it’s a violation of the collective bargaining rights that citizens have under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. And, like Bill C-4, it contravenes international conventions. We will not be intimidated by the federal government’s bully tactics.”

The 18 federal public service unions have also agreed to plan coordinated actions to mobilize federal public service employees in the face of the assault on collective bargaining rights.

The Federal Bargaining Agents of the National Joint Council are:

Push continues for ’25 and Out’ Retirement Plan: Campaign for pension reform underway on several fronts

FB Bargaining

Last month, the Public Service Pension Advisory Committee (PSPAC) met to discuss retirement-related issues in the public service. The PSPAC is the body that provides input concerning the managing of public service pension funds. It includes several unions and Treasury Board representatives.

In the meeting the PSAC successfully pushed to have early retirement reform for Border Services employees and Department of Defence Firefighters (also PSAC members) prioritized to be addressed by the committee. Dates for follow-up meetings have not yet been set.

In a recent meeting with Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale, CIU National President Jean-Pierre Fortin raised the need for there to be pension reform for CIU-PSAC members working at CBSA. The same message was communicated in a recent meeting with newly-named CBSA President Linda Lizotte-MacPherson.

PSAC National President Robyn Benson and Jean-Pierre Fortin also spoke recently with Treasury Board President Scott Brison to impress upon the government the importance of this issue to our union and membership.

At the bargaining table, our FB Bargaining Team continues to push for a commitment from CBSA and Treasury Board in support of an early retirement regime for CBSA employees. In light of the work that we do, and the employer’s legal duty to accommodate, we believe that such a retirement arrangement is not only in the interest of employees of the FB group, but also the Agency.

We call on CBSA and the Treasury Board to support the amending of our pension plan so that we might have access to the same retirement benefit as other federal workers who are required to maintain similar physical standards. It’s in the best interests of everyone involved – union members, the government and CBSA.

We’ll be sure to provide update as things progress. For more information, contact your Branch President or go to ciu-sdi.ca or psacunion.ca/employer/fb-group.

Download the PDF version of this update (bilingual document).

FB Bargaining: “We Expect More from CBSA”

FB Bargaining

FB Team takes CBSA and Treasury Board to task over heavy-handedness of CBSA management. 

Our PSAC/CIU Bargaining Team met with CBSA and Treasury Board in Ottawa this week to continue contract talks.

At the outset our Team raised with the employer that, in light of the ongoing disrespect shown by CBSA management towards PSAC/CIU members at CBSA – from rampant, frivolous disciplines to denied vacation leave requests to issues concerning hours of work at the local level – there will have to be new protections for union members in our next contract. We deserve respect for the work that we do.

Management rejected our proposal to beef up the legal indemnification policy and put it in the collective agreement. We told management that we are holding to our position, and that CBSA cannot be trusted to act in the interests of officers that may be subject to the legal indemnification policy.

The government’s proposal concerning our sick leave is fundamentally unchanged. Our position regarding sick leave is that we have no interest in agreeing to any concessions.

All PSAC tables proposed a general economic increase of 9.27% over a 3 year contract (3% per year) this week. This is in addition to the allowances that our team has proposed, and in addition to the market adjustment and other economic proposals that we’ll be making in subsequent bargaining sessions. Our objective is to achieve parity with the broader law enforcement community.

We discussed our proposed changes to the Workforce Adjustment Appendix. The Employer’s bargaining team had a significant number of questions about the Union’s proposals to which we will be responding at our next meeting. We reiterated our position against the contracting out of work. The Employer acknowledged that concerns about contracting out have been expressed by many unions in this round of bargaining.

We have a week of bargaining scheduled in June and are pushing for additional dates. We’ll be sure to update as things progress. For more information and to see our proposals and those of the government, please see the following page on the PSAC website.

Download the PDF version of this update (bilingual document).

National Board of Directors Meeting: CIU Highlights the Importance of “25 & Out”

NBoD 2016 Group Photo

During last week’s National Board of Directors meeting in Ottawa, CIU reiterated its commitment to push for a ’25 & Out’ agreement at the bargaining table. The union also elaborated on its plans to implement the resolution that was carried at the 2015 PSAC National Triennial Convention wherein members who are required to carry a firearm will be provided with independent legal counsel 24/7 in the event that they are involved with discharging their firearm. Members can expect to receive information related to this CIU/PSAC initiative in June 2016.

CIU is also planning to add new features to its national website, including information on Variable Shift Schedule Arrangements in order to facilitate the implementation of such arrangements for the different branches.

[:fr]

CIU National President Meets with Minister Goodale

Photo of CIU National President Jean-Pierre Fortin and Minister of Public Safety Ralph Goodale, March 23
CIU National President Jean-Pierre Fortin and Minister of Public Safety Ralph Goodale, March 23

On Wednesday, March 23, National President Jean-Pierre Fortin met with the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety, to discuss ongoing issues and establish a working relationship with the government. Overall, Brother Fortin described the meeting as positive, with Minister Goodale agreeing to meet with him on a semi-annual basis.

These future meetings will be an opportunity for CIU to provide the Minister with important information and keep him apprised of ongoing concerns. Brother Fortin also touched on a variety of issues, ranging from security matters to the use of automated technology at points of entry, and stressed the need for a ‘25 & Out’ pension commitment – a major CIU bargaining priority that would bring the Agency in line with other law enforcement agencies. The Minister was receptive, stating that he would look into the matter.

PSAC FB Team Pushing for ‘25 and Out’ Pension Commitment

CBSA is a Law Enforcement agency. Officers working at CBSA should be afforded the same pension benefit as other enforcement workers.

In negotiations this week with Treasury Board/CBSA our FB Bargaining Team reiterated that we are seeking a commitment from CBSA and Treasury Board that will support an early retirement plan similar to what is in place for other federal law enforcement personnel. In light of the work that we do, and in light of the employer’s legal obligation to place officers that require accommodation, we believe that such a retirement arrangement is not only in the interest of employees in the FB bargaining unit, but is also in fact in the interest of the Agency.

Day Workers
There are a number of locations across the country where CBSA management has been revoking or canceling compressed work weeks and flexible working arrangements – from Inland Enforcement to Trade Compliance to Hearings Officers. Our Team discussed again the need for our new contract to provide new protections in this area.

VACIS and HCVM
This week our Team reminded management that the employer cannot make unilateral changes without first gaining the union’s consent. Consequently we notified the employer that should the Agency attempt to contract out work associated with VACIS and HCVM, we will contact our legal counsel.

Student Work
We made proposals that would require the union to be involved in the assigning of student work, and would protect union jobs from being held by students.

Sick Leave
We addressed the ongoing sick leave issue this week by stating that we continue to seek either a renewal or improvements to the current sick leave regime. We made it clear that any improvements would need to be contained in the collective agreement. We reiterated that the underlying purpose of a sick leave system is to ensure that workers are not forced to choose between going to work sick or collecting a pay cheque.

WFA
We reiterated to the employer that we are seeking significant changes to the Workforce Adjustment Appendix. Our demands seek to preserve and improve public services, enhance protections against involuntary departures and ensure that our seniority be recognized.

We are next scheduled to meet in bargaining the week of April 11th. We’ll be sure to update as things progress.

PA bargaining: minimal interest from the employer

Our PA bargaining team met Treasury Board at the bargaining table this week with renewed determination. Unfortunately, the employer continued to display minimal interest in responding to our proposals.

Treasury Board did signal it is considering some very small movements in response to union demands in certain leave provisions, as well as improved notice provisions in the discipline article. But mostly, the Employer remained focused on sick leave concessions and complained that we had too many demands at the bargaining table.

Our bargaining team reiterated the objective to come to the table every three years or so to improve wages and working conditions and resolve problems. We tabled new language on student employment and reviewed with the employer our proposals on maternity and parental leave.

Treasury Board withdrew its demand to remove the PM-7 wage grid from the collective agreement. Our team understands there are currently no PA members at the PM-7 level, but we cannot be sure that this classification will not be populated in the future.

Work Force Adjustment: We reiterated the need for significant changes to the Workforce Adjustment Appendix in this round of bargaining. Our demands seek to make the rules more transparent and reduce the significant anxiety the process causes workers. We are also looking to preserve and improve public services, enhance protections against involuntary departures and ensure that seniority is recognized.

Sick Leave: We addressed the ongoing sick leave issue this week by stating that we continue to seek either a renewal or improvements to the current sick leave regime. We made it clear that any improvements would need to be contained in the collective agreement. We reiterated that the underlying purpose of a sick leave system is to ensure that workers are not forced to choose between going to work sick or collecting a pay cheque.

We will be back at the table the week of April 11, 2016. Stay informed by visiting psacunion.ca/pa

Update Regarding Workplace Accommodation

On February 17, 2016, members of the CIU National Executive, Sister Lisa Addario (PSACLegal Officer), Brother Murray Star (EO Representative), Brother Bruno Loranger (Labour Relations Officer) and the employer met to discuss accommodations and issues related to Appendix G-1.

In CIU’s update of January 7, we provided the following list of duties as being suitable for accommodated members at level:

  • Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
  • Alternate Inspection Services (AIS) Risking
  • NEXUS Enrolment Centres
  • Inland Enforcement Officer (no road duty)
  • Commercial (back office)
  • Telephone Reporting Centres
  • Hearing Advisors
  • Postal Operations
  • National Targeting Centre

We also indicated that CBSA was looking at the suitability of other positions for accommodated members, namely those of Instructor duties at training centres and desk duties for Intelligence Officers and Investigators.

CBSA has indicated that it will consider accommodating members in these positions. It should be pointed out that several members are already being accommodated at Rigaud. The employer has also stated that it may want to place some of our members there whose positions will be (or have been) eliminated with the closure of firearm training facilities in Prince Edward Island and at Slack Road.

Regardless of the list of duties deemed suitable, it bears repeating that members who are already in accommodated positions that do not involve face to face enforcement interactions with clients will remain in those positions.

While CBSA is willing to consider accommodating desk duties for Intelligence Officers and Investigators (in addition to Rigaud and the other duties listed above), it has indicated that all must be considered on a case by case basis. For some duties, several positions may be available while for others (e.g. Inland Enforcement Officer – no road duty), the number may be limited. CBSA further clarified that it needs to take into account the viability of suggested accommodations and must also meet financial, regional and operational requirements. Obviously, members who are placed in these positions must also have the necessary skills and knowledge (e.g. language, specialized training) to do the job.

The employer believes it has made great progress in accommodating those 108 officers who had been performing face to face enforcement but could not pass the DFC training. However, it also acknowledges that there will be other officers similarly situated who, in the future, will require accommodation.

It is the employer’s position that if a member is registered for DFC and is “trainable”, that member can remain in his/her position beyond March 31, 2016. The employer defined “trainable” as a member who either: a) has been scheduled to go to DFC; b) has failed DFC but is being provided with remedial support from the employer; or c) is in the process of obtaining their CAT III.

The employer agreed to remove the requirement for a CAT III medical for members working in postal operations.

CIU also raised concerns about CBSA requiring members to go to a Health Canada doctor for their CAT III. CIU reminded the employer that there is no legal requirement for our members to see the company Doctor.

If a member has failed the MMPI twice, CIU encourages that member to speak with a CIU Labour Relations Officer to determine next steps.

Members who do not want to attend DFC training but who plan to retire in the short term should discuss this with their Branch President. Together, they can approach the employer to discuss possible retirement dates/interim solutions. Again, note that this will be considered on a case by case basis. Note also that the shorter the period requested, the more likely it is to be approved.

The employer repeated that it had no intention of demoting accommodated officers or lowering their pay and added that such rumours were “science fiction”. They also agreed to speak with regional management team members and CIU Branch Presidents in regions where such rumours had been reported. Both parties acknowledged that where management included the union in discussions with affected members, the process had gone smoothly. CIU reminded the employer that it was to its benefit to have the union involved. The employer agreed to make it clear to its affected employees that the union was available and on hand to participate in such meetings.

CIU again confirmed with the employer the principles upon which it agreed to participate in these discussions: that members who were already in accommodated positions would continue in those positions; members would be accommodated at level, with no loss of salary or benefits; and members would be offered meaningful work.

PA bargaining: new government, few changes at the table

The PA bargaining team came back to Ottawa with high hopes for a more productive bargaining relationship with the new Liberal government. Sadly, the Liberals’ new mandate for negotiations does not seem to be fully developed.
In three days of bargaining with the employer, our bargaining team discussed the definition of contact centres with the employer, as well as PSAC’s proposals for better working conditions in these centres.
We also stressed the importance of creating a joint union-management committee to review, recommend and implement minimum standards for working conditions in these contact centres.
Our union’s proposals for Article 25 – hours of work, and particularly the demand for shift scheduling by seniority, was another focus of discussion.

We will not trade away sick leave’
Treasury Board negotiators tabled a proposal similar to that of the previous Conservative government, that would replace our existing sick leave plan. It takes away existing rights and leaves members worse off. The proposed short term disability plan would fall outside of the collective agreement and allow the government to make unilateral changes any time.
We remain open to improvements on sick leave but we will not negotiate concessions or agree to any proposal that forces members to choose between losing pay or going to work sick.

Fair bargaining and Bill C4
We are pleased to see the government move to repeal Bill C-59 (division 20), but there is still another unfair labour law on the books. The unconstitutional changes to labour laws governing the collective bargaining process under C-4 remain a key issue.
It is a mystery why the government is not repealing this legislation in light of the clear pronouncements made by the Supreme Court in the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour case. We will continue to move forward with our litigation and take all necessary steps to ensure that there is free and fair collective bargaining for the federal public service.
At the bargaining table, PSAC will continue to focus on measures to improve the delivery and quality of public services and make the federal public service an efficient and healthy place to work. This benefits all Canadians.

Bargaining schedule
The bargaining schedule has increased in frequency from every two months to approximately every five weeks. We will be back at the table the week of March 7 and again the week of April 11.
Visit psacunion.ca/pa for updates.